Recovery of Ovarian Function with Aromatase Inhibitors: In Young Breast Cancer Patients (<45) with Chemotherapy-induced Amenorrhea / 한국유방암학회지

PURPOSE: The role and safety of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in young breast cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) has not been established. The goal of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of AIs in young breast cancer patients with CIA. METHODS: From December 2000 to December 2006, 58 patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer under the age of 45 were treated with AIs as adjuvant therapy. All patients had amenorrhea for more than three consecutive months at the time of treatment. We evaluated the rates of recovery of ovarian function during the treatment, and analyzed the association of the recovery of ovarian function with age, body mass index (BMI), chemotherapy regimen, radiation therapy, and the use of tamoxifen. RESULTS: Recovery of ovarian function was observed in 16 patients (27.6%). The univariate analysis showed that ovarian function was more frequently recovered in patients younger than 40 yr of age, treated with chemotherapy regimens other than Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, 5-Flurouracil (CMF), without a history of tamoxifen therapy, and with a higher BMI. The multivariate analysis confirmed that the type of chemotherapy (p=0.034) and the history of tamoxifen therapy (p=0.043) were independent factors significantly associated with the restoration of ovarian function. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that AIs should be considered, with caution in young women with CIA; these agents may promote the unwanted recovery of ovarian function. Especially, in those patients who were not treated with CMF chemotherapy or tamoxifen, where the rates of recovery of ovarian function were higher.

Responsiveness of CPT-11 in Respect to hMLH1 and hMSH2 Protein Expression in the Primary Colorectal Cancer / Journal of the Korean Cancer Association, 대한암학회지

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the responsiveness to CPT-11 with respect to hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein expressions in primary colorectal tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 91 patients with colorectal cancer treated having undergone surgery and postoperative CPT-11-based adjuvant chemotherapy, between 1997 and 2002, were prospectively recruited. Tumor samples were immunohistochemically analyzed for the expressions of hMLH1, hMSH2, p53 and CEA proteins. RESULTS: Of the 91 tumors, 6 (6.6%) and 4 (4.4%) showed loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 protein expressions, respectively. The response rate of patients with tumors not expressing either hMLH1 or hMSH2 was higher than that of those expressing either of these proteins (p=0.026). Patients with tumors not expressing hMLH1 showed a significantly better response to CPT-11 (p=0.04). The responsiveness was not associated with the expressions of hMSH2, p53 or CEA. There were no correlations between drug toxicity and the expressions of hMLH1, hMSH2 or p53. The overall survival was better in patients responsive to CPT-11-based chemotherapy compared to non-responders. CONCLUSION: The immunohistochemical determination of loss of hMLH1 and hMSH2 expressions may be used in determining the responsiveness to CPT-11-based chemotherapy. Our results suggest that hMLH1 protein expression may be a predictor for CPT-11 responsiveness in patients with colorectal cancer.